@SvenTviking A common creationist “response” to this is that God created the light already underway. Ridiculous, I know. But it’s their response, not mine.
There could be a god, but why bother believing when humans were the ones who came up with the idea in the first place? It’s probably not true. And another thing many religious people don’t pay attention to: Religion was developed in a time where people were very unsure about their origins, and didn’t know where or how to look( at least most people). I think it’s time people ought to realize that THEY DON’T KNOW! Just be modest and admit it. Wait for a scientifically cogent answer first, please.
@prophetchannel Well, you’re right, because the term was created by a religious fundamentalist. The only reason scientists kept it was that whatever you called it was irrelevant to the whole subject.
@prophecy217 There could be a god, but why should someone disprove this? There’s no proof of it’s existence at all. It’s like asking to disprove that smurfs don’t exist.
There actually is a lot of evidence against the existence of a god.
- People on the earth believe in a lot of different gods.
- Holy books which claim to be the word of god contain mistakes.
2 strong arguments against a the existence of a god.
You seem to think you know me how is this possible since I am particular about my friends.Notwithstanding my academic achievements in the words of Albert Einstien “the only people who understand relativity are small children and scientists”.which one are you?I have not been home schooled although I wish I had since their GPA is higher than average.
Nobody knows why venus is spinning backwards, but they sure know it wasnt god! how do they know that??…people need to realize there is no evidence for god or against him. A hypothesis is basically a god of the gaps. there are many moons spinning backwards along with various planets, kind of amazing that saturn got rings too, While all you science guys are on the quest for truth, keep in mind there could be a god! and to say there isnt one is just a nothing statement! good luck proving it
@MrNewkingjames ”since all movement is relative” And you don’t understand the Theory of Relativity either. I know, theories are hard for home schooled people.
The stars beyond 6000 light years would still be winking on as the light gets here. Thats unless god placed the light of the rest of the universe just above planet Earth when he created it.
This is a pretty lousy debunk of creationism. Just tell ‘em that if the universe is only 6000 years old, we wouldn’t be able to see anything beyond 6000 light years. No galaxys.
That’s got to be one of the most absurd claims I’ve ever heard.
I would sooner believe that a supernatural being created the universe than accept that it has always been.
I know about as little about astronomy and physics as humanly possible, so I prefer to stick to what I know; namely philosophy.
This was not only educational but jam-packed with delicious pwnage.
It’s a shame that all the time you put into creating this series will be wasted on those whom it would do the most good.
Your arguments are weak and insipid and I was not impressed by your ad hominums Whether space is expanding or the astral bodies are moving is irrelevant since all movement is relative.If you don’t have constructive responses than why bother arguing?
Whenever you get a video debunking Kent Hovind you always get these mysterious characters posting absolute crap in his defence and aggressively down voting the video it happened in a spectacular fashion to Thunderf00t’s video. kent Hovind has a very large brain washed family who spend their entire time commenting on these videos. Zyozyoma may be just one such brainwashed sibling.
@SvenTviking A common creationist “response” to this is that God created the light already underway. Ridiculous, I know. But it’s their response, not mine.
There could be a god, but why bother believing when humans were the ones who came up with the idea in the first place? It’s probably not true. And another thing many religious people don’t pay attention to: Religion was developed in a time where people were very unsure about their origins, and didn’t know where or how to look( at least most people). I think it’s time people ought to realize that THEY DON’T KNOW! Just be modest and admit it. Wait for a scientifically cogent answer first, please.
@prophetchannel Well, you’re right, because the term was created by a religious fundamentalist. The only reason scientists kept it was that whatever you called it was irrelevant to the whole subject.
@prophecy217 There could be a god, but why should someone disprove this? There’s no proof of it’s existence at all. It’s like asking to disprove that smurfs don’t exist.
There actually is a lot of evidence against the existence of a god.
- People on the earth believe in a lot of different gods.
- Holy books which claim to be the word of god contain mistakes.
2 strong arguments against a the existence of a god.
“Hey, there’s a spot in Ur anus” LoL!
You seem to think you know me how is this possible since I am particular about my friends.Notwithstanding my academic achievements in the words of Albert Einstien “the only people who understand relativity are small children and scientists”.which one are you?I have not been home schooled although I wish I had since their GPA is higher than average.
You seem to think you know me how is this possible since I am particular about my friends.
Nobody knows why venus is spinning backwards, but they sure know it wasnt god! how do they know that??…people need to realize there is no evidence for god or against him. A hypothesis is basically a god of the gaps. there are many moons spinning backwards along with various planets, kind of amazing that saturn got rings too, While all you science guys are on the quest for truth, keep in mind there could be a god! and to say there isnt one is just a nothing statement! good luck proving it
@MrNewkingjames ”since all movement is relative” And you don’t understand the Theory of Relativity either. I know, theories are hard for home schooled people.
The stars beyond 6000 light years would still be winking on as the light gets here. Thats unless god placed the light of the rest of the universe just above planet Earth when he created it.
This is a pretty lousy debunk of creationism. Just tell ‘em that if the universe is only 6000 years old, we wouldn’t be able to see anything beyond 6000 light years. No galaxys.
@Zyozyoma
That’s got to be one of the most absurd claims I’ve ever heard.
I would sooner believe that a supernatural being created the universe than accept that it has always been.
I know about as little about astronomy and physics as humanly possible, so I prefer to stick to what I know; namely philosophy.
This was not only educational but jam-packed with delicious pwnage.
It’s a shame that all the time you put into creating this series will be wasted on those whom it would do the most good.
@Zyozyoma no, it will not. The universes expansion will doom it.
@AndromedasWake The term Big Bang was coined by a creationist in order to disparage the theory of rapid expansion.
@MrNewkingjames I… what?
Hmmm. Yes.
Your arguments are weak and insipid and I was not impressed by your ad hominums Whether space is expanding or the astral bodies are moving is irrelevant since all movement is relative.If you don’t have constructive responses than why bother arguing?
Whenever you get a video debunking Kent Hovind you always get these mysterious characters posting absolute crap in his defence and aggressively down voting the video it happened in a spectacular fashion to Thunderf00t’s video. kent Hovind has a very large brain washed family who spend their entire time commenting on these videos. Zyozyoma may be just one such brainwashed sibling.