What do YOU think is more likely to exist? BIG FOOT/ LOCH NESS MONSTER/ GHOSTS?
By paranominal
Published: June 28, 2009
Tagged with: Big Foot, Ghosts, Loch Ness, Loch Ness Monster, Think Big
Recent Posts
- Wonder Shows: Performing Science, Magic, and Religion in America
- Lives and Letters in American Parapsychology: A Biographical History, 1850-1987
- Ghost Contacted Through EMF
- Boxer’s Ghosts (P4/5) 2002 Pimpest Play: Boxer v Chunsang
- Ghosts of Ireland (2/3)
- Cuban TV series documents 638 attempts on Fidel Castro’s life – BBC News
I don't think there's a big foot. I'm really not sure abou the Loch Ness Monster. And I'm pretty sure there's ghosts. I mean come on why would there be so much talk about them and shows and pictures and sites and etc if they weren't real. I've never actually seen one I don't think but I've heard one and seen one do things.
Ghosts.
There are more people who say they've seen a spirit than big foot or loch ness monster
ghosts, my moms friend saw her dead mother-in-law.
Ghosts, because I've seen and felt them
Ghosts
I just think it is very true that there are spirits among us however, I don't really believe in the other choices
NONE of the above!
I would have to say big foot. He is simply described as big, hairy, man, ape, or possibly a missing link. That could probably just be tall homeless person. There is no rationale for a giant sea dinosaur. And even the fictional existence of ghosts isn't defined clearly. Ghosts have been portrayed as scary, eerie, maybe braindead, maybe coherent, so cold is there being that they make rooms cold upon entrance, in black and white for some reason, mildly transparent, and having the possible abilities to pass through walls and fly. So I have to say no.