Friday, February 17th, 2012

Chemtrail Weather Control – NBC4

Published on April 6, 2011 by   ·   39 Comments

Tags: , , ,

Readers Comments (39)

  1. inkman46 says:

    than how do you know they aren’t chemtrails. Your a tough guy online. The problem is noone can collect a sample because its so high idiot. And if you want to insult me send me your e mail and ill send you my address.

  2. AClRCLEOFLlGHT says:

    @AClRCLEOFLlGHT : And just a word of advice. Try not being a complete dipshit when entering a conversation, to avoid being identified and called out as being a dipshit.

    I have over 100 years of public knowledge to support me. I don’t need to bring evidence or support to back me up, you’re the one claiming something against what is KNOWN, therefore the burden of proof is on you.

  3. AClRCLEOFLlGHT says:

    @inkman46 : “thus ruling out the idea they are “persistent contrails”. No, the only thing that was ruled out was the accuracy, legitimacy, and support for what you just said. Don’t reply until you find one of those claims of trails being seen outside such conditions… shouldn’t be hard since you said they’re seen “constantly”. Tuck and run dude, tuck and run.

    A wise man once said, “It is better to not know… than to think you do when you do not.”

    Go… find a claim with atmospheric tests

  4. AClRCLEOFLlGHT says:

    @inkman46 : How would someone collect a sample at 32,000 ft? Fly through a trail, open a vent that allows the condensation to enter and collect on some absorbent material? I know… rocket science huh?
    I also enjoyed your claim that “contrails persists at -40 and +60% rH, and then claim they are found in other conditions… really? Post one such “claim”. I’m sure you check the rH at 32,000 feet above your house when you see a trail. CONSPIRACY THEORIST, BULLSHIT ALERT, BULLSHIT ALERT!

  5. inkman46 says:

    @AClRCLEOFLlGHT NASA’s description of conditions necessary to allow for ‘persistent contrails’ is -40*C and +60% relative humidity. Chemtrails are witnessed constantly outside of these conditions, thus ruling out the? idea they are ‘persistent contrails’. And how would someone be able to collect a sample at 32 thousand feet. Your too trusting in our government, if you think for one second they wouldn’t sacrifice you for any agenda they have your are sadly mistaken.

  6. AClRCLEOFLlGHT says:

    @inkman46 : And just a word of advice, avoid personally insulting someone when making claims unless you actually have something to support yourself with. There is NO support for chemtrails. NONE. Anything you find will be on a conspiracy website which does the same thing you do. Claim shit without proof. And they/you do it because you know there’s no proof. Get a fucking job, breathe some air, get laid from time to time, and stop spending your days as a paranoid dipshit.

  7. AClRCLEOFLlGHT says:

    @inkman46 : Like I said… gullible people. Who the hell told you that contrails will dissipate after 20 minutes? Because since contrails began, it has always been said that they can last for hours depending on the weather conditions. Any information regarding “CHEMtrails” is completely based on speculated claims. Not ONCE has a scientist ever collected a sample of such chemtrails while they’re in the sky to test them. There’s no scientific data or support for chemtrails. Worldwide.

  8. inkman46 says:

    @AClRCLEOFLlGHT O.K. genius, cirrus clouds hold heat in the atmosphere and do not reflect harmful rays back away from the earth. Contrails dissapate within 20 minutes, they dont hang around for hours or spread out. I am Educated, I have a degree and I believe they are chemical trails sprayed from airplanes. I’m not gullible and I’m not ignorant. Your the gullible ignorant moron, if you believe the government cares about your health.

  9. bobo007xx says:

    @DMB1985CA” let a thousand flowers bloom”
    Mao

  10. ManicDeprescion says:

    Post chemtrail sitings and videos at Facebook page ‘CHEMTRAIL REPORT’. Consolidate our voices and demand answers.

  11. ManicDeprescion says:

    NASA’s description of conditions necessary to allow for ‘persistent contrails’ is -40*C and +60% relative humidity. Chemtrails are witnessed constantly outside of these conditions, thus ruling out the idea they are ‘persistent contrails’.

  12. warmm0nkey says:

    The first persistent contrails were documented in 1921, and have been forming ever since. How do your ‘chemtrails’ differ from persistent contrails? The ignorance of the general public is laughable. Read a book and learn some basic meteorology.

    It takes a minimum of one day for aerosols to fall from the tropopause, but with any updraft they can stay there indefinitely. With winds upto 200mph, if particulates do reach the ground they will be hundreds, or often 1000s of miles from their origin.

  13. molligemozes says:

    bs tday they sprayd em all over belgium netherlands germany uk etc ireland first sky was blue then after 100 planes or so mixin up paterns sky suddenly grey in like an houre ? while all day other planes went over leavin no marks …. if someth happens here soon we fkd also by that shit

  14. alexisonfireforlife says:

    it’s why cases of alzheimer’s is up around the world: aluminum in the atmosphere

  15. Headshothorror4488 says:

    im by airport, same amount jets every day, past couple days NOT 1 trail !!!! then the sky will b covered, explain that loll no excuses

  16. Iceyyyyyage says:

    We humans, Can never play for god! creation weather how we want it. just a bad, bad, bad, bad, bad idea

  17. AClRCLEOFLlGHT says:

    @PQXLR : “Too late for my excuse that it was the cause”? Do you even think about the words you’re going to use before you type them out? Any aircraft footage during WWII shows contrails, I’ve even found some HUGE contrails in the backgrounds of old Hollywood movies from the 40′s given off by large “PROP driven” passenger planes. I had no “excuses” as to why they were in the sky then (and now), I had only facts. But if you disagree, where did contrails come from in the 40′s? Alien UFO’s?

  18. PQXLR says:

    1 more time proof positive the Government Knows about and what is a Chemtrail via a Governmebt Bill introduced by U.S. Rep D. Kucinich. The credible document proof positive-The Space Preservation Act of 2001 introduced by? U.S. Representative Dennis Kucinich (D-OH). [7] H.R. 2977 sought to ban the use of exotic weapon systems that would damage climate, weather, tectonic and biological systems. “Chemtrails” are specifically listed.

    LOOK IT UP & SEE the Light and the CHEMTRAILS

  19. PQXLR says:

    @AClRCLEOFLlGHT 1 more time proof positive the Government Knows about and what is a Chemtrail via a Governmebt Bill introduced by U.S. Rep D. Kucinich. The credible document proof positive-The Space Preservation Act of 2001 introduced by? U.S. Representative Dennis Kucinich (D-OH). [7] H.R. 2977 sought to ban the use of exotic weapon systems that would damage climate, weather, tectonic and biological systems. “Chemtrails” are specifically listed.
    LOOK IT UP.You believe what you want,I KNOW

  20. PQXLR says:

    @AClRCLEOFLlGHT LOL YOU my friend are Sadly MISTAKEN to believe my comment of NOT proves any of your PIPE DREAM Ideas correct.How Hilarious & immature.Don’t Embarrass yourself so much.You want it so bad you’ll spin ANY Comment to hope your absurd ideas might be taken for a near truth.As for WWII aircraft,they were all prop driven planes with VERY very minor vapor trails compared to todays modern jets.AND the Me-262 was to little to late for the Germans and for your excuse that it was the cause.

  21. AClRCLEOFLlGHT says:

    @PQXLR : That was your best rebuttal? Sorry to inform you, but “not” doesn’t constitute as a defense for a stance on a subject beyond the 5th grade. So thank you for completely proving my previous comment correct. Idiot.

  22. jamestargetedindiv says:

    Watch a Pre-January 8th copy of Inception. Listen closely when the actors say imagine, reality, and safe, or point pistols. You’ll hear the words, Loughner, offin’ her, part of the word Giffords, and much more. Some say they hear, do it.

  23. TheRealCoop says:

    was für ein humbug

  24. Salihovicable says:

    /watch?v=QTalyHfdfaQ

  25. ZenMaster93 says:

    haha Fernsehen… Wer dem sprechenden Kasten glaubt ist sowieso verloren… ?

    Lieber Infokrieg.tv

  26. ZenMaster93 says:

    @D7Double7B Es ist nicht gut ! Es wird von den Regierungen und Mächtigsten dieser Welt, die alles kontrollieren und auch Globale Elite genannt werden, auf die Menschen “gesprüht ohne das wir es merken. Diese Dinger sind extrem Gesundheitsschädlich und führen z.B zu Asma. Es sind Teil des Entvölkerungsplan !

    Suche im Internet !

  27. Ziggurathss says:

    danke!

  28. 1elmatador1 says:

    @ChaosN

    ah ja.. und diese, doch sehr diffferenzierte, aussage basiert natürlich auf objektiven und nachvollziehbaren fakten deiner studie, die du über mehrere jahre geführt und nun mit einer doktorarbeit darüber abgeschlossen hast.
    bemerkenswert.

    Ps: Wenn ich solche Kommentare nur lese die unter mir stehen solche sind die ersten die spätestens im 3ten Weltkrieg drauf gehen werden…ihr informiert euch nen scheißdreck darüber und schreibt solche sinnloses dreckskommentare.

  29. ChaosN says:

    buuuuuuuuuuulshit

  30. D7Double7B says:

    was bringt den chemtrail überhaupt? für was is das gut?

  31. gonzilio79 says:

    LOL, Chemtrails? Gibts nicht und wirds auch nie geben. Wäre viel zu teuer und dabei zu wenig effektiv. Alles Nonsens…

  32. nehatpuraj says:

    omg ZDF… glaubt diesem sender nie etwas wenns um solche themen geht …dieser sender ist leider “nicht offiziel” gekauft worden und von “anderen Leuten” gesteuert…alles Propaganda und Volksverblödung…hinter diese themen stekt alles andere nur nicht das was für dem menschen gut ist..

  33. leonkochhafenmiau says:

    das is ja geil aba leider giftig………

  34. Chidanandaji says:

    I humbly offer my newly discovered insights to all sincere investigators. Just Google search: ”Why Contrails Are Not Chemtrails – by Bill Woollam”

    It explanes contrails

    On the other hand, for those sincere scientists here, please feel free to research my compilation titled:
    “My Thoughts on 9/11 and False Flag Terrorism – by Bill Woollam”

    or another short analysis titled: “The Battle For Libyan Oil Fields – by Bill Woollam”
    Just Google any of those. I like to look outside the box.

  35. 2ndSamuel710 says:

    Great new vid on Youtube titled “The Last Days of the Big Lie” ? ? youtube.com/watch?v=-48HQpgQRz­0
    Safer to be in German work camp than German city as cities were being carpet bombed mercilessly.
    Dr. David Duke’s latest vid- “The Real Rogue Nuclear State” great also: youtube.com/watch?v=KLSlmLx4Fls
    FDR vs Hitler. Both took power/office 1933 their countries unemployed 25-30%. 6-8 years later Germany rate 2% USA still 20%. How? Hitler threw off International Bankers they HATE him 4 it still.

  36. A6en7Smi7h says:

    @Techies06 And you think you are not manipulated controlled etc ? You completely missed sens of my post.

  37. jlettis says:

    @polski1986 The barium in chemtrails is to block radiation. You don’t want to know the rest. Enjoy life to it’s fullest!

  38. RokerBorut says:

    HAARP + CHEMTRAILS + BEAM FROM OUR SATELITES = MATRIX. GOD HELP US, IF THIS IS TRUE. OH SHIT, THERE IS NO GOD.

  39. piglettetoy says:

    HAARP
    WHO RUNS HAARP?
    WHAT AUTHORITY AND MANDATE DO THEY HAVE?
    WHO DO THEY REPORT TO?
    WHAT IS THEIR AGENDA AND DIRECTIVE?
    WHAT ARE THEIR NAMES?
    jsf




Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

Latest Headlines

Related Stories

Hot Categories

Sites to See

The All-New Nook! The Simple Touch Reader just for $139 - Buy Now at BarnesandNoble.com!

Also: